Legal Opinion

Brookfield v. Harahan Viaduct Improvement District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1932No. 4-2768PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The Harahan Viaduct Improvement District was created by an act of the General Assembly of 1923 for the purpose of constructing and maintaining an approach to the Harahan bridge spanning the Mississippi River opposite the city of Memphis. This approach is in Crittenden County, and is known as the Harahan Viaduct. Shortly after the creation of the district, its commissioners met, and Renfrow Turner was elected chairman, and, on the first day of November, 1923, by resolution duly passed, it employed the appellant and M. B. Norfleet, Jr., attorneys, to represent the said district for an agreed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seitz v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Harrison v. NortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Chambliss v. ReppySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. Hall v. HuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Morgan v. LeonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Starnes v. SadlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Nelson v. Berry Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Isgrig v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API