Roe v. Roe
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
I. Leo Glasses,, J.
In a proceeding commenced by a putative father to obtain a declaration of paternity and an order of filiation, the court, on its own motion, questioned the petitioner’s standing to originate the proceeding. The respondent mother is not represented by an attorney. The court designated a Law Guardian on behalf of the child to assist the court in resolving the question of standing insofar as the resolution of that question might also affect the interests of the child. (Family Ct. Act, § 249.)
Seducing the facts to their simplest terms, the respondent mother was married to one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Shielcrawt v. MoffettNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Commissioner of Public Welfare v. KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Barrett v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Commissioner of Welfare v. JonesNew York City Family Court · 1973
- John J. S. v. Theresa L.New York Family Court · 1979
- La Croix v. DeyoNew York City Family Court · 1981
- Juan R v. Necta VNew York City Family Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.