Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Postex Cotton Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1950No. 12888_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.

The respondent urges the point, presented by motion to dismiss before the trial examiner, and presented and reurged before the National Labor Relations Board and in this Court, that the Board was forbidden by the statute 1 to complain of the charge made by the Textile Workers Union of America, C. I. O., that respondent refused to bargain with it. The question, as well stated in the Board’s brief is: “Whether the Board is authorized to issue a complaint upon a charge filed by an international [union] affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations if the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. Congress of Industrial OrganizationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Congress of Industrial Organizations v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Highland Park Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. DantSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. WiltseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  4. Olin Industries, Inc., Winchester Repeating Arms Co. Division v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers [A. F. L.], Intervenor)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API