Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1951No. 17584PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

Plaintiff in error does not argue the general grounds in his brief. We therefore deem it sufficient to say that the evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

The exceptions pendente lite raise the question whether or not a defendant in a criminal case who asks for a change of venue, on the ground that he can not obtain a fair trial in the county where the case is then pending, is entitled to a direct bill of exceptions before the trial of the case to a judgment denying the motion for change of venue. This question has been decided adversely to the contentions of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carrigan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Womble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Worthy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Well v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Radford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Hollis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API