Lindeleaf v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK,J.
This case presents a fundamental challenge to the procedure used by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) to select hearing officers and render decisions on postelection objections in union representation elections. It also calls into question the threshold requirements for compelling the ALRB to grant an evidentiary hearing on such objections.
We conclude that ALRB regulations for selecting investigative hearing examiners (IHEs) and delegating to them the initial task of conducting hearings and issuing recommended findings to the Board do not conflict with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Company, Inc., United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Ralphs Grocery Co. v. ReimelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Penny S.California Supreme Court · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.