Legal Opinion

Garvin v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1980No. 11007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*828OPINION

2Per curiam

A hearing officer of the Department of Motor Vehicles determined that appellant failed to comply with Nevada’s implied consent law, NRS 484.383 to 484.387. Consequently, appellant’s driver’s license was suspended. Appellant then sought judicial review of the Department’s decision. The district court reviewed the administrative proceedings, and affirmed the driver’s license suspension.

The hearing officer found that appellant was arrested for driving under the influence of drugs, and that he was advised as to the implied consent law. Upon his arrest appellant was requested to submit to a…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gandy v. State Ex Rel. Division of Investigation & NarcoticsNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Quesada v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Windish v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Dept. of Motor Vehicles v. JenkinsNevada Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API