Legal Opinion

Medlock v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 28, 1997No. CR 96-1435PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

The appellant, John Ervin Medlock, was convicted in Fort Smith Municipal Court of driving while intoxicated and for refusing to submit to a breathalyzer test. He appealed his convictions to the Fort Smith District of Sebastian County Circuit Court. At trial, over Medlock’s objection, the circuit judge refused to instruct the jury on the charge of refusal to submit to the breathalyzer test, found him guilty as charged, and suspended his license for six months. On appeal, Medlock asks that we reverse his conviction for refusal to submit on the basis that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Calnan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Edwards v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Johnston v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MacE v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Etoch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Medlock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Barrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API