Legal Opinion

Heckler v. Chaney

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1985No. 83-1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

470 U.S. 821 (1985)

HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

v.

CHANEY ET AL.

No. 83-1878.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 3, 1984

Decided March 20, 1985

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Deputy Solicitor General Geller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, Acting Assistant Attorney General Willard, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Leonard Schaitman, John M. Rogers, Thomas Scarlett, and Michael P. Peskoe.

Steven M. Kristovich argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were David E.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rehnquist; Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Gonzalez Ex Rel. A.F. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l ForestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API