Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 10, 1997No. 147A96PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

There are two issues on this appeal. The first is whether the trial court improperly reconsidered defendant’s status as the dependent spouse at the alimony modification hearing, and the second is whether there has been a change of circumstances warranting a mod*433ification of the alimony order in this case. We answer the first issue in the negative and we remand the second issue for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The following facts and circumstances are pertinent to this appeal. Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr. (plaintiff) and Janet F. Cunningham (defendant) were married…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephens Ex Rel. Hyde v. Trust for Public LandDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  2. Parsons v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Bryant v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Spencer v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Cunningham v. CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API