Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 10, 1997No. 147A96Published

1Opinion of the Court

480 S.E.2d 403 (1997)

Bruce T. CUNNINGHAM, Jr.

v.

Janet F. CUNNINGHAM.

No. 147A96.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 10, 1997.

Maxwell, Freeman & Bowman, P.A. by James B. Maxwell, Durham, for plaintiff-appellee.

Vosburg & Fullenwider by Ann Marie Vosburg, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

FRYE, Justice.

There are two issues on this appeal. The first is whether the trial court improperly reconsidered defendant's status as the dependent spouse at the alimony modification hearing, and the second is whether there has been a change of circumstances warranting a modification of the alimony order in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API