Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 29, 1998No. 80,145PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

A motorist was stopped for speeding. After a police officer had information necessary to issue a citation, he questioned the motorist about drug usage and requested permission to search his pickup truck. The motorist denied the officer permission to search the truck. The officer informed the motorist that because he did not consent to a search, a drug-sniffing dog would be brought to the scene. If the dog sniffed drugs, the vehicle would then be searched without the motorist’s consent. The motorist then capitulated and agreed to a search.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API