Markham v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTU, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction of burglary of a vehicle. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.04 (Vernon 1974). After determining the appellant’s guilt, the jury found an enhancement paragraph in the indictment to be true and assessed punishment at 15 years’ confinement and a $10,-000.00 fine. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.42(a) (Vernon 1974).
Appellant’s sole ground of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. A recitation of the evidence is, therefore, required.
The State presented three witnesses at the trial. The complaining witness testified…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phelps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
- Markham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Markham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Markham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Phelps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.