Legal Opinion

Markham v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 9, 1986No. 04-85-00434-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTU, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of burglary of a vehicle. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.04 (Vernon 1974). After determining the appellant’s guilt, the jury found an enhancement paragraph in the indictment to be true and assessed punishment at 15 years’ confinement and a $10,-000.00 fine. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.42(a) (Vernon 1974).

Appellant’s sole ground of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. A recitation of the evidence is, therefore, required.

The State presented three witnesses at the trial. The complaining witness testified…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phelps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  2. Markham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  3. Markham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Markham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  5. Phelps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API