Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Rakagis
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1955No. 5913PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Chief Justice.
The question is whether Chapter 197, Laws 1939, as amended, § 67-16-1 et seq., 1953 Comp., denying the contractor redress in the courts of the state, for the collection of compensation due under the contract, unless he alleges and proves that he was duly licensed under the provision of the act at the time the cause of action arose, operates to defeat a claim for compensation under a contract which reads:
"Roswell, New Mexico
"February 26, 1954
"Carl Fisher
“1108 So. Grand
“Box 81
“Roswell, New Mexico
“This will confirm our understanding that you are to build the bar, back bar…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Desmet v. SublettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. SpearsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Kaiser v. ThomsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. New Mexico Dry Cleaning Board v. CauthenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Breithaupt v. AbramNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mascarenas v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Campbell v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Ballew v. DensonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Triple B Corp. v. Brown & Root, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.