Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzales

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 23, 2017No. 2d Crim. No. B276101PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, P. J.

*496Here we affirm a judgment involving various counts of Penal Code violations relating to child molestation. The prosecution introduced evidence of uncharged sex offenses defendant committed against the victim through the victim's own testimony, not through the testimony of third parties. ( Evid. Code, § 1108, subd. (a).) Such testimony, though not common, is in accord with established precedent. We are concerned, however, with the relationship between CALCRIM No. 1191,1 instructing on evidence of uncharged sex offenses against the victim, and Evidence Code 1108. These concerns are well stated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. McAlpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. RelifordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. VillatoroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. Rodriguez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. D.B. (In re D.B.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. (HC) Phea v. PfeifferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Andy Karl Kelly v. Rob St. AndreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
  5. Chantell Gosztyla v. Palleres, Warden of CCWFDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API