Legal Opinion

NYIA GORE v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2016No. 15-CM-354PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Nyia Gore appeals her conviction after a bench trial for the misdemeanor offense of malicious destruction of property. We reverse and remand because the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress incriminating admissions and physical evidence that police obtained by entering and searching her home without a warrant. The Fourth Amendment protects “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their ... houses... against unreasonable searches and seizures.” 1 Recognizing that “the ‘physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prince Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. United States v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. ALLEN J. LOGAN, JR. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. United States v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. In re T.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API