State v. Gonzales
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceBustamante, Judge
(specially concurring).
{51} I agree with the majority that affirmance is appropriate. However, I would take the opportunity to finally determine the standard of proof required to establish that a youthful offender is not amenable to treatment or rehabilitation. I concur in the result the majority has reached as to the Apprendi issue, though I cannot agree with most of the analysis which produces it.
STANDARD OF PROOF
{52} The majority declines to decide which standard of proof is appropriate for the amenability finding. I agree that the two provisions Defendant relies upon in the juvenile code…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.