Legal Opinion

Haugsted v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1933No. 7188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEE, District Judge.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of conviction against appellant. The indictment charged in count 1 that Haugsted “being then and there engaged in habitual violations of the National Prohibition Act” sold one pint of whisky on October 11,1932. The second count alleged in the same form a like sale on October 21st of the same year. Count 3 charged possession of one pint of whisky on the same date, and count 4 set up the maintenance of a common nuisance by him in the Palace Hotel. Appellant was convicted by a jury and was sentenced to fourteen months in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hecht v. AlfaroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  2. Alvarado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. McElvogue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Rachel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Olivito v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  2. McElheny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  3. Allred v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API