Legal Opinion

Hecht v. Alfaro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1926No. 4588PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The only rulings of the trial court presented by'the bill of exceptions and assignments of error are rulings upon the admission of testimony. The plaintiff in his brief makes but cursory reference to those rulings, and we shall discuss them with like brevity. It was not error to require the plaintiff to say whether he made any complaint to the defendant when he ascertained that the coffee was not shippéd on the first available vessel. That evidence was pertinent to the defendant’s plea that the plaintiff had waived shipment in May. For like reason it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Oregon R. & Navigation Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  3. Bort v. E. H. McCutchen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Hall v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Trapp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Kleinschmit v. Farmers Mut. Hail Ins. Ass'n of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API