Legal Opinion

Leeper v. Brady & Burgess Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In the absence of proof that defendant, as plaintiffs landlord, had actual or constructive notice of the lead paint in plaintiffs apartment, Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Rodriguez v Amigo, 244 AD2d 323; Lanthier v Feroleto, 237 AD2d 877). Although defendant retained the right to reenter the premises, there is no proof that the defective condition was visible and longstanding (see, O’Rourke v Sachel Hardware, 178 AD2d 134, 135; Perez v City of New York, 168 AD2d 227,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Lanthier v. FeroletoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Rodriguez v. AmigoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Perez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. O'Rourke v. Sachel Hardware, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Advantage Federal Credit UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Boler v. MalikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API