Legal Opinion

Boler v. Malik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

*999that actual or constructive notice of the dangerous lead condition may be imputed to defendants because defendants were aware of chipping and peeling paint; defendants are both real estate brokers and landlords of other properties; defendant Paramjeet K. Malik is a registered nurse; and, before purchasing the subject property, she received mortgage documents for another property that referred to Federal lead based paint regulations (see, Smith v Saget, 258 AD2d 641, 641-642; Leeper v Brady & Burgess Mgt. Corp., 254 AD2d 695; Andrade v Wong, 251 AD2d 609, 609-610; Lanthier v Feroleto, 237 AD2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andrade v. WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Lanthier v. FeroletoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Leeper v. Brady & Burgess Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API