Collins v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.
This appeal arises from the denial of Joseph M. Collins’ (“Movant”) Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief. On September 21, 2006, the motion court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law denying Movant’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective.
In reviewing the denial of a post-conviction relief motion, this Court treats the findings of fact and conclusions of law as presumptively correct. Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). As such, our review is limited to a determination of whether the findings of fact and conclusions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Bryan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rowland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008