Williams v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., Judge.
Roderick D. Williams (“Williams”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion asserting his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to fully explain the ramifications of accepting the State’s offer of an open plea of guilty to one charge of statutory rape in the second degree, rather than proceeding to trial on more serious charges. We affirm the motion court’s decision.
Factual and Procedural History
Given the narrow scope of Williams’ appeal, we set forth only those facts necessary to complete our review. Williams was charged with two counts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Hurst v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bryan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rowland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BESCHER v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011