Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Director
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 5, 1965No. [App. No. 133, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The applicant Barnes has thrice been determined to be a defective delinquent, first by a jury in 1958, next in 1961 by Judge Manley who found as a fact that he would be a threat to society if he was released (see Barnes v. Director, 227 Md. 641, 642, cert. den. 368 U. S. 1004, wherein his application for leave to appeal was denied), and last by Judge Byrnes in October 1964.
In his application for leave to appeal from the finding of Judge Byrnes, Barnes claims through his court-appointed counsel, that there was insufficient evidence to support the finding of defective delinquency, the evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- John Sas v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution, Albert Delanor Murel v. State of Maryland and Director of Patuxent Institution, James C. Shine v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution and the Maryland State Legislature, Timothy Patrick O'COnnOr v. State of Maryland Director, Patuxent Institution, George L. Creswell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Salinger v. SuperintendentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Alt v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Boitnott v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Fields v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968