Meyer v. CDI CONTRACTORS, LLC
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
11 In a per curiam opinion dated March 5, 2009, we declined to address the' merits of the appeal in this case because of appellant Meyer’s briefing deficiencies, stating as follows:
Meyer failed to abstract depositions that provided a substantial amount of evidence to support CDI’s motion for summary judgment. Further, on July 6, 2005, Meyer filed a response to CDI’s motion for summary judgment that stated: “[Meyer] has controverted the facts alleged by [CDI] as detailed in [Meyer’s] Brief in Support of this Response. [Meyer] incorporates by reference his Brief in Support of this Response.”…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meyer v. CDI CONTRACTORS, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dachs v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Mason v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Mason v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017