Legal Opinion

Meyer v. CDI CONTRACTORS, LLC

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 21, 2009No. 08-654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

11 In a per curiam opinion dated March 5, 2009, we declined to address the' merits of the appeal in this case because of appellant Meyer’s briefing deficiencies, stating as follows:

Meyer failed to abstract depositions that provided a substantial amount of evidence to support CDI’s motion for summary judgment. Further, on July 6, 2005, Meyer filed a response to CDI’s motion for summary judgment that stated: “[Meyer] has controverted the facts alleged by [CDI] as detailed in [Meyer’s] Brief in Support of this Response. [Meyer] incorporates by reference his Brief in Support of this Response.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. CDI CONTRACTORS, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dachs v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Mason v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Mason v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API