Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mason v. Mason

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 22, 2017No. CV-16-488Published

1DissentJohn Dan Kemp, Chief Justice

The majority has answered a certified question, which involves an issue of statutory interpretation that was argued by the parties in the circuit court, and has remanded the case to the court of appeals to address the merits. Because appellant Debra Mason has submitted a brief with a deficient abstract and addendum in violation of Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(5), (8) (2016), I would order rebriefing before this court answers the certified question. For this reason, I respectfully dissent.

Rule 4-2(a)(8) of the Arkansas Supreme Court Rules provides that the addendum contained in the brief…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bryan v. City of CotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Meyer v. CDI CONTRACTORS, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Whiteside v. Russellville Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. CITIFINANCIAL RETAIL SERVICES DIVISION OF CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API