Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Perry v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 7, 2017No. 16-0911Published

1ConcurrenceSalter, J.

I concur that the petition for mandamus must be denied. I write only to provide an exclamation point to my colleague’s statement that DCF’s letter to Petitioner “is not the model of clarity” (op. at 650). When DCF prepared the mass-mailed written communications directed to the many recipients of supplemental nutrition assistance program (“SNAP”) benefits in Florida notifying those recipients of (1) a new eligibility requirement, and (2) the potential loss of benefits if the new requirement is not fulfilled, DCF was obligated to comply with the “easily understandable language” requirement of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fla. League of Cities, Inc. v. Admin. Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API