Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Greenberg

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 12, 1929No. Nos. 3949, 3950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal of the Trustee — No. 3950.

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The question on this appeal, stated in the abstract, is whether one holding property under a fraudulent conveyance is entitled to reimbursement for expenditures made during the fraudulent tenure. The question, as it arises in this case, is answered by the facts. Marcus Cases (C. C. A.) 19 F.(2d) 825; (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 454; (D. C.) 21 F.(2d) 483; (C. C. A.) 23 F.(2d) 303.

Jacob and Bennie Marcus conveyed a store property situated in Pittsburgh to Sarah Mareus Greenberg, their sister. Shortly thereafter a petition in bankruptcy was filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. Soutter Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Lynch v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Harris v. TysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  4. Marcus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  5. Marcus v. Pennsylvania Trust Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klein v. Topside Corp (In re Exten Associates, Inc.)District Court, D. Maryland · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API