Legal Opinion

White v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal action in which the plaintiff was charged with the crime of assault and robbery, being armed with a dangerous weapon.

The complaint, in substance, alleged that the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and R.V. Jenkins, one of its employees, commenced and prosecuted the action complained of; that plaintiff was arrested in said action, bound over to the grand jury and confined in jail until discharged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hess v. Oregon Baking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Stamper v. RaymondOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Nally v. RichmondOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Putnam v. StalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Gee v. CulverOregon Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hryciuk v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lampos v. Bazar, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Shoemaker v. SELNESOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Nicholson v. RoopNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API