Legal Opinion

Beezer v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1962No. 36486PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The issue presented is another and, as yet, unexplored facet of the obligation of a municipal corporation, existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Washington, to comply with the laws of that state.

The city of Seattle has applied for and received a license *240from the Federal Power Commission for the development of a hydroelectric project on the Pend Oreille River (referred to herein as the Boundary project), and involving the construction of a dam on a site presently owned by Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County. (It is conceded that the city intends to condemn…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beezer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Beezer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Beezer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Beezer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Beezer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API