Legal Opinion
Beezer v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1963No. 37037PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
This is an application by the plaintiff, Robert R. Beezer, for a writ of mandamus to compel the Superior Court of King County to proceed as heretofore directed by this court:
“We, therefore, set aside the summary judgment of dismissal, and direct the trial court to proceed with the determination of whether the property of the P.U.D., which the city of Seattle now takes the position it must condemn, is an ‘electric power and light plant or electric system, or any part thereof.’ If it is not, the action should be dismissed and the city left free to proceed to exercise its power of condemnation.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Beezer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982