Legal Opinion

Koly v. Nassif, 88399 (5-24-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2007No. 88399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Defendant Tony Nassif (appellant) appeals the trial court's denying his motion for relief from judgment, reconsideration, and request for hearing. After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm.

I

{¶ 2} On August 30, 2005, a judgment for a cognovit note in the amount of $101,493.15 was entered against appellant in favor of plaintiff Richard Koly (appellee). This cognovit note was related to appellee's selling a liquor agency to appellant. While many of the facts regarding the transaction are in dispute, the parties agree that a cognovit note dated February 25, 2005…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Harris v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Key v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Matson v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Bank v. Jenkins, 06ap-1192 (7-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hillman v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth. v. RabbOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API