Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wright

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2013No. 2012-SC-000368-DGPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice VENTERS.

Appellant Commonwealth of Kentucky sought discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals determining that our statutory provisions governing probation do not extend a term of probation, so as to allow for the revocation of Appellee Lee Andrew Wright’s probation after the expiration of the five-year period fixed by the trial court at sentencing. The Commonwealth contends that, when read together, KRS 533.020(4) and other relevant statutory provisions operate to automatically extend any probationary period previously fixed by the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shawnee Telecom Resources, Inc. v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Hall v. Hospitality Resources, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Richardson v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Layne v. NewbergKentucky Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pennyrile Allied Community Services, Inc. v. RogersKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. DulinKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Whitcomb v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Unifund CCR Partners v. HarrellKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Davenport v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API