Legal Opinion

Scott v. Gaulding

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1939No. 12500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eeid, Chief Justice.

The Court of Appeals certified the following question: “Does the mere failure of the payee of a note, who is the holder thereof, to institute suit to recover on the note against one of the sureties thereon, before the expiration of the period of limitation in which suit must be brought against this surety, amount to a release by the payee of the obligation to him of a co-surety on the note whose obligation is not barred by the statute of limitations, where the payee’s act in refraining from instituting the suit as indicated was not procured by or consented or agreed to by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. GauldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862
  2. McMillan v. Heard National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Bigby v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Comer v. DufourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Reid v. FlippenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. United States v. Glens Falls InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  3. Scott v. GauldingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API