Legal Opinion

Hyde v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 23, 2004No. CR-03-1006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Return to Remand

The appellant, James Matthew Hyde, appeals the denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P. On January 11, 2002, Hyde filed a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., attacking his capital-murder conviction and his sentence of death. The petition was accompanied by an in forma pauperis declaration to proceed without the prepayment of the required filing fee. On February 20, 2004, the circuit court denied Hyde's Rule 32 petition without ruling on his request for indigency status. Hyde filed a notice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. CAROLINA MILLS LUMBER CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  2. Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  2. Beamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  3. Simmons v. DuBose Construction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  5. Barclay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API