Scheile v. Fordyce

Defendants (vendors)1 appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiffs (purchasers) specifically enforcing an option contract for the purchase of a house, assigning as error the following:

1) The trial court’s holding that the original option agreement was orally extended beyond its stated September 1, 1977, expiration date;

2) The holding that the option, if it was extended, was not terminated by written notice delivered to plaintiffs on July 3, 1978;

3) The decree specifically enforcing the option contract where there was no "meeting of the minds” with respect to several material terms:

4) The…