Laster v. Hiebert

This is a suit for specific performance of a lease and option agreement involving 10 acres of land in Clackamas County. Defendants appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiff. We affirm.

Defendants’ primary contentions are that plaintiff did not perform the required conditions precedent so as to be entitled to a decree of specific performance of the option provision and that defendants did not waive the failure by plaintiff to perform her obligations under the terms of the lease and option.

On May 18, 1968, the parties entered into a lease and option agreement under which plaintiff paid $60 at…