Greenline Equipment Co. v. Covington County Bank
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARLSON, J.,
for the Court.
¶ 1. We have before us today a case which the trial court characterized as containing “the second-most convoluted set of facts ever known to Mississippi jurisprudence.” Notwithstanding being confronted with a difficult case, the trial judge, in his original Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, stated that “[wjhile tempted to simply cut this Gordian knot with the judicial sword and make everything go away, this [trial court] has attempted to untie the same.” Although the trial court meticulously considered the record before it and eventually entered the original…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Culbreath v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Sarris v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- ABC Mfg. Corp. v. DoyleMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. SneedMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Lee Tung v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bennett v. Hill-Boren P.C.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Covington County Bank v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Champluvier v. BeckMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Estate of Martin Luther King Jr., Inc. v. BallouDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012
- Cross Point Church v. Andrews (In re Andrews)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.