Burrows v. French
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Izlar, J., Greenville, Action by Lewis P. Burrows against A. H. French. The opinion states the case. cited Story Confl. L., §§ 576-8 ; Wood Lim., § 8 ; 5 Rich., 198-9 ; 2 Bail., 217 ; 4 Rich., 224; 13 Peters, 327; 2 Mass., 89; 18 S. C., 549; Code, §§ 112,121; 1 Strob., 326; 3 Johns., 266 ; 10 Id., 465 ; 18 N. Y., 570 ; Rice, 316 ; 2 McCord, 331; 9 Rich. Eq., 433; 2 Id., 120. cited 18 S. C., 549; Code, §§ 94, 112, 121; 54 Ga., 126; 3 Harr.
Read the full summary
Before Izlar, J., Greenville, Action by Lewis P. Burrows against A. H. French. The opinion states the case. cited Story Confl. L., §§ 576-8 ; Wood Lim., § 8 ; 5 Rich., 198-9 ; 2 Bail., 217 ; 4 Rich., 224; 13 Peters, 327; 2 Mass., 89; 18 S. C., 549; Code, §§ 112,121; 1 Strob., 326; 3 Johns., 266 ; 10 Id., 465 ; 18 N. Y., 570 ; Rice, 316 ; 2 McCord, 331; 9 Rich. Eq., 433; 2 Id., 120. cited 18 S. C., 549; Code, §§ 94, 112, 121; 54 Ga., 126; 3 Harr. (N. J.), 262; 11 Bush, 19 L; 13 Am. Dec., 368.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice McIver.
In this case there is no controversy as to the facts, and the single question presented is whether the plaintiff’s action, under the conceded facts, was barred by the statute of limitations. The action was on a note, dated 20th of March, 1874, payable on demand, with interest annually, with a payment endorsed thereon, dated 14th of December, 1879. At the time of the making of this note, both payee and maker were citizens of the State of New Hampshire, and the payee still resides there. The maker, however, some time after the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Lawson v. TrippUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Meyer v. PaschalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- MacRi v. FlahertyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1953
- Van Deren v. LorySupreme Court of Florida · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.