Legal Opinion
Faye Black et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 30, 2026No. 6:23-cv-01218Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS FAYE BLACK et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 23-1218-EFM-GEB UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Faye Black’s Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 184) of her suit alleging that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) has caused trichloroethylene (“TCE”) to contaminate her and the proposed class members’ properties. After the Court held a hearing on this matter, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Revise the Class Area (Doc. 217). For the reasons stated herein, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.