Legal Opinion

Roth v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

This is an action by the beneficiary of an insurance policy, not the personal representative of the deceased insured, to recover the face amount of a policy issued by the defendant. The defenses are that the policy did not become effective because the insured was not in good health at the time of the payment of the first premium, and that the policy was rescinded by the defendant because of material misrepresentations made in the application as to the state of health of the insured. The misrepresentations consist of statements that the insured was in good health at the time of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Westover v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Hoyt v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Siebern v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Preston, New York County Courts1958
  2. Lowe's of Roanoke, Inc. v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GoldsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Greene v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Roth v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API