State v. Klokic
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶ 1 Nermin Klokic appeals his conviction on one count of aggravated assault. Because we cannot determine that the jury unanimously concluded that Klokic committed a specific act that constituted the criminal count for which he was charged, we reverse Klokie’s conviction and remand for a new trial.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 This appeal stems from a “road rage” incident between Klokic and the occupants of another vehicle. 1 According to the testimony at trial, Klokic cut off another vehicle containing two occupants, including Brian M., while Klokic was driving…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GuerraArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- King v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel AlmeidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.