Legal Opinion

Alexander v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1988No. 86-770PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we are called upon to deal with the issue of the award of attorney fees 1 in rental housing act litigation to a pro se tenant who is a member of the District of Columbia Bar.

I

Petitioner Alexander, an attorney, recovered treble damages from his landlord in a Rent Administrator’s decision, dated April 8, 1985, under the Rental Housing Act of 1980, D.C.Code §§ 45-1501 to -1597 (1981). 2 The decision was based on the landlord’s plain violation of the statutory ban against implementing two rent increases within a six-month period. D.C.Code § 45-1519(g) (1981). The Rent Administrator…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Eddie David Cox v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  5. Edward Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McReady v. Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Upson v. WallaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Hampton Courts Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Lenkin Co. Management v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Donahue v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API