Legal Opinion

Lower v. Lower

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1924No. File No. 5278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

The facts of this case as shown by the evidence are practically without dispute. W- H. Lower in his lifetime decided to make disposition of his land so that in the *459event of his death title to his lands would vest in his wife, and certain of his children. Pursuant to this purpose, he and wife, July 28, 1919, went to witness J. A. Dixon, president of State Bank •of Seneca, this state, at which Lower kept the papers and transacted all. his business with reference to property. Dixon was intimately acquainted with Lower. Lower deposited his moneys from time to time in the bank, and Dixon kept for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kyle v. KyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Walter v. WayIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Wortz v. WortzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larsen v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Larsen v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API