Legal Opinion

Pignatario v. Meyers

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 8, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

There is no obligation at common law on the part of a landlord to make repairs upon leased property or to keep the same in safe condition, apart from a contract so to do. Gallagher v. Button, 73 Conn. 172, 175, 46 Atl. 819; Valin v. Jewell, 88 Conn. 151, 156, 90 Atl. 36. The lease (Exhibit B) in the instant case imposes no such liability. In this case there is no contractual liability, and the action is one purely of tort, and must show some primary right of plaintiff’s invaded by defendants. It appears to be established by the evidence that the tenement above the store of plaintiff had been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Priest v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Cook v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Moore v. . GoedelNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Stebel v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  5. Valin v. JewellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API