Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commissioner of Mental Retardation

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 1, 1990No. 88-P-1197PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

As a provisional employee of the Commonwealth, Anne Marie Smith would not ordinarily have been entitled to a trial-type hearing to challenge her demotion from Supervisor of Individual Service Planning and Coordination to Day Care Services Specialist at the Monson Developmental Center (“Monson”). 2 See Rafferty v. Commissioner of Pub. Welfare, 20 Mass. App. Ct. 718, 723-725 (1985). In disciplining Smith, however, the superintendent of Monson, Donald J. Fletcher, cited as cause acts of intentional fabrication and dishonesty by her. The nature of the charge made by Fletcher raises the question…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Sheldon L. Wulf v. The City of Wichita, Gene Denton, and Richard LamunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Silva v. WordenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. O'CONNOR v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Smith v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Fontana v. Commissioner of the Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Fontana v. COMMR. OF THE METRO. DISTRICT COMM.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API