Legal Opinion

Fontana v. Commissioner of the Metropolitan District Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 1, 1993No. 91-P-618PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

Based on a determination that the plaintiff, a probationary police officer, had been involved in a hit and *64run accident and had untruthfully denied having any knowledge of this incident, the defendant, the commissioner of the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC), discharged the plaintiff. The latter, in this action, asserted that the charges were false and claimed that he had been deprived of constitutionally protected property and liberty interests, and that the defendant had broken its contract with him. A judge of the Superior Court entered partial summary judgment for the defendant on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Fall River v. AFSCME Council 93, Local 3177Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. Downing v. City of LowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Fontana v. COMMR. OF THE METRO. DISTRICT COMM.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  4. FERLISI v. GalvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Padilla v. PadulaMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API