Barger v. Pratt

DECISION

Before the Court is defendant Pratt Whitney's (Pratt) motion for summary judgment pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. Rule 56. The plaintiff, William Barger (Mr. Barger), objects to the motion.

Facts/Travel

Mr. Barger filed a complaint on October 13, 2005, alleging,inter alia, that he had suffered personal injuries as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing aircrafts, aircraft engines, and parts manufactured by Pratt, a national corporation incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in Connecticut.

Barger's military record and the testimony in his deposition indicate…