Doe v. Gelineau
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
When it comes to piercing corporate veils, courts are loath to act like Vlad the Impaler. 1 Indeed, the stakes are too high for courts regularly to disregard the separate legal status of corporations. Because a corporation is an incorporeal, “artificial creature” of the law, Cook v. American Tubing & Webbing Co., 28 R.I. 41, 49, 65 A. 641, 644 (1905), it constitutes “an artificial person distinct and separate from its individual and often changing stockholders.” Vennerbeck & Clase Co. v. Juergens Jewelry Co., 53 R.I. 135, 138, 164 A. 509, 510 (1933). 2 Thus, courts…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Palmisciano v. Burrillville Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Superior Boiler Works, Inc. v. R.J. Sanders, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- R & B Elec. Co., Inc. v. Amco Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Alterio v. Biltmore Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Krystkowiak v. W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Mills v. State Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Heflin v. KoszelaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Klunder v. Brown UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.