Legal Opinion

People's Insurance v. Paddon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 7, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, P. J.

At the time in question, and for several years prior thereto, Stephen Paddon & Co., the plaintiffs below, were and had been dealers in the city of Chicago, in sal-soda and other chemicals. There were two warehouses in which they were accustomed to keep their merchandise — one being the Empire Bonded Warehouse, and the other the Empire Free Warehouse, as they were called, but they were adjoining buildings. Stephen Paddon himself always attended to the matter of procuring insurance on the goods of his firm. There was during most of said time a street insurance broker of the name of Miller, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Audubon v. . Excelsior Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manchester Fire Assurance Co. v. Insurance of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Janss Investment Co. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Mosteiko v. National Inter Insurers Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  4. Stoelke v. HahnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  5. Honeycutt v. LoggAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API