Legal Opinion
Archer v. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1998No. Nos. 96 cv 598, 96 cv 2712PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
GERSHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Bertha Ortega (“Ortega”), Cheryl Archer (“Archer”), Angela Bryant (“Bryant”), Timothy Green (“Green”), Christina Guzman (“Guzman”), Mary Hewitt (“Hewitt”) and Carol Lynch (“Lynch”) are former employees of the Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc. (“EOC”), a private, not-for-profit anti-poverty organization. Defendants are the EOC; two Nassau County Head Start programs that are delegate agencies and programs of the EOC; three Nassau County Community Action Programs (“CAP”s), also delegate agencies and programs of the EOC;…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Archer v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMM'N OF NASSAUDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Husain v. SpringerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002